FBlog

Branding

The end of a pragmatic China?

by Phyllis Yip on May 9, 2011

Despite the stereotypical flamboyant Chinese shoving their way through the world’s luxury brands, China is still very much a pragmatic country.  From urban planning to trade policies, the norm amongst leaders is still to take on a modest, almost cautious, approach. This attitude extends to branding, resulting in even the leading domestic brands appearing ordinary and similar to one another and lacking personality.

Top Chinese brands are already well established and accepted. However, they are facing challenges to remain competitive. Domestically, more and more Chinese, especially the youth, are starting to prefer foreign competitors – choosing Lexus over BYD, Google instead of Baidu, Nike instead of Li-Ning, etc. At the same time, these brands are also aggressively trying to grow globally but face difficulty in differentiating themselves beyond price. Chinese companies know they are losing competitiveness but are often unsure what they are lacking in. Their products offer similar styles and functionalities at lower prices, advertising and communications is typically more aggressive, and overall awareness and reach is higher. If the problem is not in operations, capabilities or resources, maybe the issue is in branding.

China values pragmatism – from a person’s behavior to the way companies operate. In branding, the standard attitude is to choose the safer approach, rather to appear ordinary than standing out. This is contrasted against foreign brands that comprehensively execute their point of difference internally and externally. To be a leading Chinese brand, they believe they need to be a source of national pride and appeal to the entire nation. A lot of restraint is taken to ensure that diverse audiences can accept the brand. As a result, many leading brands end up copying each other and looking the same.

For a country as diverse as China, with distinct dialects and cultures across regions, it is difficult to even define what a nationalistic brand should look and feel like. Intense competition is deterring Chinese brands from taking any risk. But instead of staying the same, possibly the way to stay competitive is actually to introduce different ways of thinking and initiate new trends. The Chinese are receptive – if anything, they’re one of the fastest to adopt new things and ideas – as seen by their obsession for new consumer electronics and widespread use of social media. With a history where everything aims to be equal for all, the new generation of Chinese is longing to express themselves and actually be seen as unique individuals. They are looking to foreign brands because they can help them define their own image through the brand’s personality.

As China continues to challenge traditions in developing the nation, perhaps this is an opportunity for local brands to also open up, shifting away from the pragmatic way of thinking to become more daring and different.

Tags:

Join the Discussion

  • Harry Liu - May 10, 2011

    I think why most of Chinese business men don’t want to invest in branding is because they don’t see the value of the branding and the profit that bring to them. As I said before, a low-end, replica can gain huge sales and profits in China already. But I am sure they will see the value and will be in the BRANDING circle one day as China customers and market is changing as you said above.

    And what we are doing here in China is to promote this process and convince them. -HL

  • David C - May 12, 2011

    Yes I think Chinese companies need to be less short-sighted and focused on immediate solutions that will end up hurting their brand in the long run. Taking risks to be different and investing in time and resources are important in building successful brands that last.

  • Will Golsong - May 17, 2011

    I agree entirely with all the points raised. I think a lot of it comes down to the issue of building a symbolic brand for the Chinese consumer, rather than the current mode of branding in China (of Chinese brands) which seems to focus too strongly on functional strategies (price etc.). China still has some room to grow in the branding department, it definitely has great potential to do so.

  • Samantha - May 23, 2011

    Hi Phyllis! Loved your article, I gained a lot of insight from it. I’m now in Barcelona (to my surprise, there are a ton of clothing shops opened by Chinese nationals selling imported clothes from China), and I’ve noticed that the pragmatic behaviour of Chinese brands you mentioned are not just evident locally in China but in Europe too…

    Not sure if my observations are accurate… I feel that the current view taken by the abovementioned Chinese brands is rather shortsighted and that their pragmatic behaviour is quite ironic. Like you mentioned, no doubt they are able to increase current sales figures by keeping prices low, however, their conservative behaviour of not investing/ seeing the need to invest/ knowing how to invest in branding and advertising is actually going to cost them future sales to their foreign competitors!

    It is such a paradox that almost everything in the world is now “Made in China”, but yet little is known of their best companies due to the lack of branding. While their brand as a country is that they are known to be able to make just about anything and sell them at attractive low prices, perhaps they should not take this for granted, but should focus more on developing their local brand names as companies with strong reputations for quality, innovation and service so as to cause customers to be willing to pay a premium for their products.

FutureBrand is part of McCann Worldgroup, the official marketing services provider for the London 2012 Olympic and Paralympic Games.

www.interpublic.com